What is Fair Trade coffee? You've probably seen this in the organic friendly stores but if you're like me you don't know what it means, why it's important, "they" just make it seem like the right thing to do.
Black Gold: Wake Up and Smell The Coffee purports to explain the coffee industry, especially the high end coffee shops that are infesting America, and explain how much of the high priced coffee money reaches the producer. Actually: "while we continue to pay for our lattes and cappuccinos, the price paid to coffee farmers remains so low that many have been forced to abandon their coffee fields" as we might have suspected, very little of the price for that Mocha Grande makes it to the farmers that grew the stuff.
The movie apparently focuses on the Ethiopian coffee industry. But the issues it explains ought to be global due to the effect of globalization.
Plastic jack-o'-lantern threatens deer's life What happens with the local wildlife is attracted to Trick-and-Treating? Well, they get a plastic pumpkin stuck on their head, and they cannot eat or drink, threatening them with starvation, and it raises concerns by the people over the plight of the poor animal.
I suppose this draws out the best in us, and we want to help such animals. And I wish this deer the best.
But consider what Modern Society is doing to the wildlife. Every time a vacant field is turned into a shopping mall, wildlife has less place to live. Every time we drive our car, it spews more poison into the air and water, increasingly poisoning everything the wildlife has to eat. Every passing car on the highway keeps the wildlife from occupying the space occupied by the highway. That is a huger threat to wildlife than the few who get plastic pumpkin's stuck on their heads.
I think one of the universal values of living beings is for the environment around us to suit the bodies we inhabit. Modern technology, however, drives us to build this gigantic machine that is gobbling up the planet. The machine wants us to create an environment that suits the machine, but if we step back we see the two environments are vastly different.
Why do people who live in cities fantasize about pristine nature scenes? Such fantasies represent something lacking in the lives of people who have such fantasies. I suggest that fantasy derives from our innate human desire for an environment that suits our bodies, the natural world. But our technological society is building a different world.
It's election season and we have silly politicians pulling silly stunts to try to get elected. I don't watch television so I don't experience this first hand, but I hear the TV is full of the typical ugly political campaign advertising. That's partly why I don't watch TV. In any case in addition to the TV advertising YouTube has drawn a number of political and corporate videos. And, the presence of these videos are causing some to question whether YouTube is being ruined. But I think it's an example of the question: Who owns a community?
An interesting sidebar this year is the growing effect of YouTube. It's about sharing video content, and it has several viral features that has helped propel the site into mainstream America. Well, at least among those of mainstream America who are intelligent enough to figure out how to post to YouTube.
Apparently YouTube users were originally brought on board with a promise, possibly explicit, that the site would be for their use, for them to share whatever video content they wanted to post. But given the number of eyeballs now browsing YouTube it has drawn corporate types, and political types. Consider this video:
It's decrying a set of videos posted by obvious political hacks who are brazenly violating YouTube's rules, and who are somehow able to get links into Google's search engine results pretty quickly. The author of that video has a certain conception of the purpose of YouTube, and s/he's being offended by the destruction of that purpose. And this demonstrates very well the question at the beginning of this posting: Who owns a community?
YouTube is an example of an online community. A community forms when a group of people come together for common activities, shared activities that head to a common purpose. In YouTube's case the purpose is sharing video content and creating contact with one another through video content.
YouTube and Google may think they own the community. YouTube built the community infrastructure and enticed the people into the community, and Google bought everything that is YouTube. So by some measures Google owns the thing. But let me ask you, is the community the web site, or is the community the people?
Obviously I believe the community is the people. Without those people YouTube would be just another web site, one of the zillions of them on the Web. It is the people who enliven the YouTube site with activity and life. And what's valuable about YouTube is the sharing between people, and the connection created between people via that sharing.
What control does Google/YouTube have? Obviously as the owners of the site they can do anything they want. But if they manage to offend the community members, those people will vote with their feet. It's not all that hard to implement something like YouTube, what's hard is getting people on-board. The example would be eBay's phenomenon in the auctioneering space, where there are dozens of online auction houses but only one (eBay) who has a major presence. That is the community in action, and eBay has been carefully nurturing its community.
The real world analogy I think of is a bar owner. The bar owner earns their money by operating a space for a community to form, siphoning some money out of the pockets of people who come to meet one another. For the bar to be successful the bar owner has to offer an inviting space. And the people can abandon a bar if the bar owner screws up the space. Can the bar owner be dictatorial? Maybe. But a dictatorial bar owner might see few patrons unless the bar is extremely inviting in some way. (I'm thinking of that "Soup Nazi" character on some TV show)
When Google bought YouTube did they end up owning the community? Nope. They bought a service, and to do well with it they need to learn to nurture community. YouTube did an excellent job of this.
In the 1930's to 1950's Urban Renewal meant building highways so cars could more easily drive around. It was Robert Moses who drove this effort in New York City, destroying many local neighborhoods and perhaps it is he and is "urban renewal" that is responsible for the destruction of the South Bronx and the departure of the Brooklyn Dodgers.
Natural Resources and Sustainable Development is a public forum for information and communication concerning natural resources and their interface with the economy, the environment and society. Natural resources featured on this website include minerals, oil and gas, biodiversity, energy, and water. It appears to be managed by the UN Conference on Trade and Development
A husband and wife team living off the grid in the deserts of West Texas. On their web site they publish an extensive collection of information on alternative energy and other forms of sustainable living necessary to live off the grid.
